Article by Kenneth Uptegrove
Edited by Lora Uptegrove
I don't want
to offend you, but do you know what a Futurist or Preterist
is? If you don't know, you are probably a Futurist, and
you
really need to know what a preterist is.
Just trust me on this for a minute, and read this shocking
statement:
Preterists call
us "Futurists" (Premillennialists) because we believe Jesus
will return to Earth at the end of the great tribulation
period and before the 1000 years of peace begins. However, Preterists believe the Antichrist and the Second Coming
happened almost 2000 years ago (way back in 70 AD), and
(again) we Premillennialists believe the antichrist (and the
Second Coming) will come in the future.
Since the term
"Futurist" is something Preterists call Premillennialist, most
Premillennialist never heard that term (Futurist) or the term
"Preterist."
This may not sound important to
you yet, but you will see in a minute that it really is
important to you. Please hang in there a little longer.
The
subject here is eschatology, which is the study of end-time
events, as illustrated by the book of Revelation.
The
end-time events include the coming of the antichrist, the 7
year tribulation, the Second Coming, and Christ ruling during
the 1000 years of peace...if you are a Premillennialist.
But if you are a Preterist or Historist you don't believe in
any of these prophesied events.
The
next great move of God is more about quality than quantity. It’s
more about restoration of the first century church the Apostles
established, than about a two thousand year accumulation of
traditions and error.
Revelation 7:9 shows us a multitude too big
to count, so we know the quantity will be there, but this passage
also makes it clear that the Bride will make herself ready.
Today God is bringing the restoration of His 1 Corinthians 12, 13 &
14 model for a church service to His church, and bringing
forth His Kingdom on earth as it is in heaven!
Pardon me if
I'm wrong, but you probably don't have a clue as to what
most…if not ALL of the above "eschatological
teaching" are. But, if I'm right, then I think you would
appreciatea
teaching that will inform and protect you from error you are
unaware of, and lead you to Biblical truth.
Act 17:11 These were
more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they
received the word with all readiness, and searched the
Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so.
2Ti 4:1 I charge you therefore before God and the Lord
Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His
appearing and His kingdom:
2Ti 4:2 Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of
season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and
teaching.
2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not
endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires,
because they have itching ears, they will heap up for
themselves teachers;
2Ti 4:4 and they will turn their ears away from the
truth, and be turned aside to fables.
This subject is rarely
heard from the pulpits...but it will encourage you to take
your Bible study very seriously.
For the
first 55 years of my life the only end-time teaching I knew
anything about was the pre-tribulation-rapture view. I was
ignorant, docile, and naďve, and I think that is where most of
us are today. It never occurred to me to ask if there were
other teachings to consider (or shun) before deciding what
to believe about end-time events. I am not criticizing the
pre-tribulation-rapture view, I'm just saying that is the only
one I knew, I didn't know there were any
others...period.
Keep in
mind that most eschatologies make the identical statement of
faith, saying that they derive their eschatology straight from
the Bible. All claim to stand squarely on the Word.
All are supported by brilliant scholars who claim
to love the Lord Jesus Christ equally as much, and are often
found in our own denomination...and then they ride off into a
dozen different directions. But God is not the author of
confusion, and they all obviously can't be right, and time
will test them all.
We Bible
believing Christians believe a great falling away is coming,
but the nature of this event it not quite clear in the minds
of many believers. It
has never occurred to many of us that the falling
away—properly defined—is erroneous teachings in our (yours,
mine, every) doctrinal group. This sounds like a
wild accusation, but if you are a Berean seeker of wisdom
and truth you will want to read this. (Acts 17:11)
According
to the Ryrie study Bible, "There are four principal
viewpoints concerning the interpretation of this book
(i.e., the book of Revelation)",
(1) the preterist, which
views the prophecies of the book as having been fulfilled in the early
history of the Church;
(2) the historical, which
understands the book as portraying a panorama of the history of the
Church from the days of John to the end of time;
(3) the idealists, which
consider the book a pictorial unfolding of great principles in constant
conflict, without reference to actual events; and...
(4) the futurist, which
views most of the book [chapters 4-22] as prophecy yet to be
fulfilled..."
These four are the only
schools of eschatology, but as if to further confuse the situation, there
are several variations of each.
The idealist view has more to
do with the book of Revelation than with the rest of Scripture. For that
reason the idealist view gets absorbed, more-or-less, into the preterist
and Historist view, and tends to lose its identity as an eschatology. At
least, that is how I see it. One variation on the idealist view is the
liberal, humanist, agnostic attitude, and is of no interest to Bible
believers. Therefore the liberal view is disregarded in this discourse.
Too often the
assumption is made that since the Bible is infallible, and
since the doctrine of our faith comes straight from the
Bible, that our doctrine and the Bible are equally
infallible, and are (therefore) synonymous terms. Yet this
same confession of faith results in many different
doctrines.
If being
Scriptural makes our doctrine infallible, then how can we have
dozens of different doctrines authenticated by the same test
of doctrine?
We know the
answer---the Bible is infallible, but we are not—but that
gets overlooked! As the old saying goes, "The main barrier
to truth is the assumption that we already have it."
We see through a glass darkly
(1 Cor. 13:12). We are subject to sin and error, even when studying the
Bible, and the hundreds of Bible believing denominations out there
demonstrate that to be true. Picture an old-time wagon wheel for a moment.
Think of the eschatological teaching of any congregation as being the hub
or axel of the wheel, and the spokes as being all the doctrines that
emanate and revolve around that wheel. If this be true, then if
there is error in the eschatological teachings of a congregation, then all
their other doctrines are going to be tainted because they all revolve
around and emanate from the eschatological hub.
We all agree that even though
we are called to be perfect, none of us have actually achieved
perfection yet (Col. 3:14; Heb. 6:1; John 17:23). We all sin and are
subject to error. Therefore, in all probability, we all are in error
about something. But---being born again---we would immediately repent of
our error...IF...we could be convinced that what we consider to be "a
sacred doctrine from on high" is, in fact, a deception from the pit.
Since Satan does
not have any truth to build even one true doctrine upon, he is
free to have a
thousand false doctrines, many of which are made up of a
palatable mixture of God's truths and Satan's lies. This, of
course, demonstrates how any eschatology can be both in error,
and in truth--all at the same time!
Jesus declared (in Matthew
15:13 KJV) "...every plant, which my heavenly father hath not planted,
shall be rooted up." I think that Jesus is telling us that every
doctrine and every tradition that God did not introduce, He will
eventually root up. Understanding this warning should compel us all to
study ALL the eschatologies carefully. John the Revelator advised us to
"look up and be ready." As for me and my household, we will keep
our eyes and ears on Jesus, not the professional eschatologists (who
disagree with each other).
SCHOLARS WHO WEAR
BLINDERS
Many scholars
make it a rule to never study any eschatology but the one they
believe; and even if they do, they read only what scholars of
their school of eschatology have written about other
eschatologies. It turns out that most Bible scholars have not
honestly and methodically studied any eschatology other than
the one he/she was required to study while in seminary--no
alternatives offered.
We all understand the power
of peer pressure and the loyalty we all have to our family, alumni, and
denomination. It can easily become more important to be warmly accepted
than to be painfully right.
We are decidedly
pre-millennial, but we do not find it wise to be more specific
than that in light of the wisdom expounded upon in this
article. It is better to be knowledgeable of all the
eschatologies but not committed to any of them so that we
will be more open to the leading of the Holy Spirit and the
events of history unfold.
We all need to
continue to press into the intimate relationship that Jesus
requires of us in order to discern the times. Then being in
tune with the Holy Spirit, we will have spiritual eyes to
see, and spiritual ears to hear, what is REALLY coming down.
This is just speculation on
our part, but it becomes clearer to us all the time that end-time
events are not going to happen like any of the professional eschatologists
think it will. The fiction books have been written, the movies have
been made, and multitudes believe these scenarios, these fiction
accounts, these theories...God help us.
Most importantly...we love
the brethren and do not disregard the fellowship of those who are not of
our particular persuasion concerning end-time events. Since the Holy
Spirit indwells all true born again Christians, how dare we place
ourselves above the Holy Spirit by not receiving whom He indwells.
When pondering why there
is so much diversity, confusion, error, and reproach among those called
Christians, one may wonder why the Bible doesn't speak quite so
clearly on this subject of
eschatology. We propose that
God wants this to be a mystery so
as to keep Satan from knowing with exactness, not us.
We have the Holy Spirit to show us when prophecy is being fulfilled, Satan
doesn't. But that also means that we need to know the Lord's voice
so that we can hear Him telling us what He is doing. So many
Christians either do not know His voice, or are so sold out to a
particular doctrine (of men) that they won't/can't listen to any other
message from God or man (He who has ears to hear).
In our definition and
discourse on many of the schools of eschatology, we are very critical of
some mainline denominations, as well as the Charismatic movement, that are
not pre-millennial. Yet, as
my book and articles clearly show, we are ourselves Charismatic. We
believe that the Acts model, the Ephesians 4:11 ministries of the apostle,
prophet, evangelist, pastor, and teacher, and the 1 Corinthians 12 gifts
of the Holy Spirit have been in the church since the day of Pentecost. The
Holy Spirit is now bringing the church into more maturity and preparing us
for the time we find ourselves in...the days just prior to the Second
Coming.
We believe the following
doctrines are in serious error:
the replacement theology, and preterism. We feel that only
pre-millennial views can be accurate, and all other views (post-millennial
and a-millennial) are in serious error, and sometimes heretical.
Most old line Protestant
denominations came out Catholicism and are still a lot more Catholic than
they would like to think. Even the most Evangelical and Charismatic
churches have the rudiments of Catholicism in them, so it should
not be surprising that a form of Catholic Preterism would be found in some
of them. A history book that documents those Roman roots is titled:
Pagan Christianity, The Origins of Our Modern Church Practices, by
Frank Viola.
When the premise
of any philosophy or theology is wrong, that twists/
distorts
everything else they believe. As I see it, the eschatology of all
doctrinal groups is the wheel's hub that all their other doctrines must
revolve around and be in agreement with. We are now in the time (just
prior to the great tribulation) when eschatology’s (and the
doctrines that revolve around them) will stand or fail.
TAKE A CAREFUL
LOOK AT THE BELOW DIRECTORY TO READ A DESCRIPTION OF EACH OF
THESE POINTS OF VIEW IN ORDER TO BE INFORMED AND PROTECTED
FROM ANY OF THE POSTMILLENNIAL AND AMILLENNIAL VIEWS.
DIRECTORY TO THE DIFFERENT
ESCHATOLOGICAL GROUPS MENTIONED ON THIS PAGE
Synopsis of
the End Times: A look at the popular beliefs of today
by Mike
Morrill
Mike Morrill was able to chat with many of the
advocates of the various positions just to make sure he was
stating their position accurately. Mike tried to be
neutral and fair to each view. Our thanks to Mike for this easy
to understand study of all the schools of Eschatology.
Here is Mike's updated version as of Dec 2009.
The Pre-Tribulation, Pre-Wrath, Mid-tribulation
rapture, and Post-Tribulation coming of Christ doctrines all
affirm that Jesus Christ is coming back bodily to rule and
judge in the future. They can be lumped together as
Premillennial views.
The core doctrine of Jesus Christ's second
coming, as taught consistently in Scripture, is as follows:
"Jesus Christ is coming again bodily to earth to rule and
judge."
Premillennialism in
Christian eschatology is the belief that
Christ will literally reign on the earth for 1,000 years
at his
second coming. The doctrine is called premillennialism
because it views the current age as prior to
Christ’s kingdom. It is distinct from the other forms of
Christian eschatology such as
amillennialism or
postmillennialism, which view the millennial rule as
either figurative and non-temporal, or as occurring prior to
the
second coming. Premillennialism is largely based upon a
literal interpretation of
Revelation 20:1-6 in the
New Testament which describes Christ’s coming to the earth
and subsequent reign at the end of an apocalyptic period of
tribulation. It views this future age as a time of
fulfillment for the prophetic hope of God’s people as given in
the
Old Testament.
Historically
Christian premillennialism has also been referred to as
"chiliasm" or "millenarianism".
The
"Chiliad"
("ch" is pronounced as "k") is another term we are not
familiar with, but it is the Greek word for 1,000.
The
theological term "premillennialism" did not come into
general use until the mid-nineteenth
century, the modern period in which premillennialism was
revived. [Taken from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premillennialism]
The Preterists call
Premillennialists "Futurists" because Preterists believe the
Antichrist (and the Second Coming) came in the distant past
(in 70 AD), and the Premillennialists believe the antichrist
(and the Second Coming) will come in the future. Since
the term "Futurist" is something Preterists call
Premillennialist, most Premillennialist never heard that term
(Futurist) or the term "Preterist."
But it is high time they did.
Pre-Tribulational Rapture:
The pre-trib view holds that the church will be "raptured"
before the entire seventieth week of Daniel. This is a
prevalent view in countries that have never experienced
widespread persecution, such as the United States. Jesus then
comes back bodily at the end of the seventieth week of Daniel
to rule and judge.
Mid-Tribulational Rapture:
The church will escape the last half of the seventieth week,
also known as the Great Tribulation. Jesus then comes back
bodily at the end of the Tribulation to rule and judge.
Pre-Wrath
Rapture: The
basic aspects of the pre-wrath view are that the "rapture" is distinct from the
"second coming" and the "rapture" will take place between the sixth and seventh
seals. Jesus then comes back bodily at the end of the seventieth week of Daniel
to rule and judge.
Post-Tribulational Second Coming:
In most versions of post-tribulationism, the "rapture" and the "second
coming" are at the same time. Post-Trib people do not consider
themselves to be Pre-Wrath. Jesus Christ comes back for His elect,
they meet Him in the air and He comes bodily to earth immediately to
rule and reign.
The second coming
of Christ is a cornerstone of Biblical doctrine. Our Lord
promised it, the apostles confirmed it, and the entire book of
Revelation celebrates it. Below are just a few examples of the verses
that establish this fact.
John 14:1-3 "Do not let your hearts be troubled.
Trust in God; trust also in me. In my Father's house are many rooms;
if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to
prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I
will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where
I am."
Matthew 26:64 "Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.
"But I say to all of you: In the future you will see the Son of Man
sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds
of heaven."
Luke 21:27 At that time they will see the Son of Man
coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
The return of Christ will be visible. He will not come
in secret; He will not come "mystically," or only to those with eyes
to see Him. All humanity will witness His coming, and those who do not
belong to Him will be terrified.
Acts 1:11 "Men of Galilee," they said, "why do you
stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken
from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen
him go into heaven."
Matthew 24:29-30 "Immediately after the distress of
those days "`the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give
its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies
will be shaken.' "At that time the sign of the Son of Man will
appear in the sky, and all the nations of the earth will mourn.
Rev 1:7 Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every
eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of
the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen.
The Second Coming of Christ will be Bodily. He will not
come "spiritually," He will not return "in His Body" the Church. He
has a body now, a glorious body, witnessed by the apostle John (Rev
1:12-16), and when He comes in clouds of glory, it will be in that
glorious body.
Philippians 3:21 who, by the power that enables him
to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly
bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.
Zechariah 14:3 Then the LORD will go out and fight
against those nations, as he fights in the day of battle. On that
day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem,
and the Mount of Olives will be split in two from east to west,
forming a great valley, with half of the mountain moving north and
half moving south.
He will come in Power and Glory--unlike His first
coming, His true nature will not be concealed. He will come at the
head of a heavenly army, as the conquering Sovereign that He is.
Titus 2:13 while we wait for the blessed hope-- the
glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,
Matthew 24:30 They will see the Son of Man coming on
the clouds of the sky, with power and great glory.
Pre-millennial Historicism--The Classic Form of
"Historic-Premillennialism"
Sir Isaac Newton, Charles Spurgeon, Francis Schaeffer, George Eldon Ladd,
and many of Christianity's greatest theologians held the
pre-millennial Historist position.
Historic
premillennialism:
Like dispensational-pre-millennialism, historic-pre-millennialists
holds to the premillennial return of Christ. Jesus will reign on Earth
over all nations after the tribulation, anti-Christ, etc. Many
historic-pre-millennialists hold to a “post-tribulational rapture,”
unlike most dispensational-pre-millennialists who believe in the “pre-trib-rapture.”
This refers to the timing in relation to the "tribulation” of God
taking His chosen out of the world. Unlike
dispensational-pre-millennialism, historic-pre-millennialism does not
see a prominent place for physical Israel but holds to what
dispensational-pre-millennialism call "replacement” theology"—the idea
that Gentiles are grafted into the covenant as partakers of God’s
promises and blessings to Israel in the Old Testament. Similar to
dispensational-pre-millennialism, historic-pre-millennialism is
pessimistic about the present era that will culminate in increased
depravity, the rise of the antichrist, and the tribulation—only to be
later followed by the glorious millennium.
Replacement Theology
essentially teaches that the church has replaced Israel in God’s plan.
Adherents of Replacement Theology believe the Jews are no longer God’s
chosen people, and God does not have specific future plans for the
nation of Israel. All the different views of the relationship between
the church and Israel can be divided into two camps: either the Church
is a continuation of Israel (Replacement Theology / Covenant
Theology), or the Church is completely different and distinct from
Israel (Dispensationalism / Premillennialism).
Replacement
Theology teaches that the Church is the replacement for Israel and
that the many promises made to Israel in the Bible are fulfilled in
the Christian Church, not in Israel. So, the prophecies in Scripture
concerning the blessing and restoration of Israel to the Promised Land
are "spiritualized" or “allegorized” into promises of God's blessing
for the Church. Major problems exist with this view, such as the
continuing existence of the Jewish people throughout the centuries and
especially with the revival of the modern state of Israel. If Israel
has been condemned by God, and there is no future for the Jewish
nation, how do we explain the supernatural survival of the Jewish
people over the past 2000 years despite the many attempts to destroy
them? How do we explain why and how Israel reappeared as a nation in
the 20th century after not existing for 1900 years?
The view that
Israel and the Church are different is clearly taught in the New
Testament. In this view, the Church is completely different and
distinct from Israel, and the two are never to be confused or used
interchangeably. We are taught from Scripture that the Church is an
entirely new creation, that came into being on the Day of Pentecost,
and will continue until it is translated to heaven at the Rapture
(Ephesians 1:9-11; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17). The Church has no
relationship to the curses and blessings for Israel. The covenants,
promises, and warnings are valid only for Israel. Israel has been
temporarily set aside in God's program during these past 2,000 years
of dispersion.
1 Now the LORD said
to Abram, "Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And
from your father's house, To the land which I will show you; 2 And I
will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make
your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; 3 And I
will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I
will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will
be blessed."
Preter: a
prefix, meaning “beyond,” “more than,” “by,” “past,” occurring
originally in loanwords from Latin (preterit), and used in the
formation of compound words (preterlegal).
THE TRAGEDY OF
AMILLENNIALISM
Excerpts from Pg 256
in Learn
The Bible in 24 Hours by Chuck Missler
Several tragic ideas or logical assumptions are
derived from amillennialism.
First, all
of the Messianic promises throughout the Old Testament are at risk,
promises that point to the dynasty of David ruling the earth through
Jesus Christ, the Messiah.
Second,
amillenialism
allowed the early church to become extremely anti-Semitic. Jews have
suffered through nineteen hundred years of persecution, much under the
banner of Christ, because of these views.
Third, it caused the
Church to lose its moorings, its roots. We serve a Jewish King. We
serve a church founded by Jewish leaders. And we venerate a Jewish
Scripture. God through with Israel, yet the destiny of Israel is
denigrated by amillennialism.
Fourth, the promise
given to Mary by the angel Gabriel is rendered indeterminate. She was
specifically told that her child would rule on the throne of David.
The throne of David did not exist during those days. It has yet to be
reestablished.
The fundamental issue
is really hermeneutics. How do you go about interpreting the
scriptural text? To the extent that you take it literally, you will be
driven to a premillennial point of view. To the extent you are willing
to treat the text symbolically or allegorically you will drift toward
the amillennial perspective, rationalizing these promises in
figurative terms.
It is the discovery
that God says what He means, and means what He says, that raises the
fog of diffidence and energizes the most exciting adventure of
anyone's lifetime!
Preterists
say that everything in Revelation has already taken place and is all
past history. Reconstructionists
claim the Church has replaced Israel and has inherited the promises
that I were given to her. Neither of these are Scriptural doctrines.
There are
at least four kinds of preterism. For lack of better terms we will call them
mild, moderate, partial, and extreme.
·
MILD preterism teaches
that the Book of Revelation was fulfilled during the first three centuries
as God waged war on the two early enemies of the church: Israel and Rome.
The first half of Revelation teaches that Israel was defeated in A.D. 70,
while the last half of Revelation is about God's conquest of Rome in the
fourth century when Constantine declared the Roman Empire Christian. Thus,
this earliest form of preterism teaches that Revelation was fulfilled in
the first 300 years of the church's history.
·
MODERATE preterists
believe that almost all prophecy was fulfilled in the A.D. 70 destruction
of Jerusalem by the Romans. They do believe that a few passages still
teach a yet future second coming (Acts 1:9-11; 1 Corinthians 15:51-53; 1
Thessalonians 4:16-17) and the resurrection of believers at Christ's
bodily return.
Most Partial
Preterists also believe the term Last Days refers not to the last days of
planet Earth or the last days of humankind, but rather to the last days of
the
Mosaic Covenant which God had exclusively with national
Israel
until the year AD 70, see also
Supersessionism. As God came in
judgment upon various nations in the
Old Testament, Christ also came in judgment against those in Israel
who
rejected him. The "last days," however, are to be distinguished from
the "last day," which is considered still future and entails the
Second Coming of
Jesus, the
Resurrection of the righteous and unrighteous dead physically from the
grave in like-manner to Jesus' physical resurrection, the
Final Judgment, and the creation of a literal (rather than covenantal)
New Heavens and a New Earth free from the curse of sin and death which was
brought about by the fall of
Adam and Eve, also called the
Kingdom of God. Thus partial preterists are in agreement and
conformity with the historic eucemenical
creeds of the Church and articulate the
doctrine of the resurrection held by the early
Church Fathers. Partial preterists hold that the
New Testament predicts and depicts many "comings" of Christ and that
the phrase Second Coming means second of like kind in a series for the
Scriptures record other comings even before the judgment-coming in AD70,
thus eliminating that event as the "second" of any series, let alone the
second of the series in which the example if the earthly, physical
ministry of Christ. Partial Preterists believe that the new creation comes
in redemptive progression as Christ reigns from His heavenly throne,
subjugating His enemies, and will eventually culminate in the destruction
of physical death, the "last enemy" (1 Cor 15:20-24). If there are any
enemies remaining, the resurrection event cannot have occurred.
A variant form of
Partial Preterism developed within
Catholic
tradition that identified the woman in Revelation 12 as
Mary rather than being symbolic of
Israel
and/or the
Church in Protestant forms of Partial Preterism.
Partial Preterism
relies heavily on the account of
Flavius Josephus in describing the
destruction of Jerusalem as a first hand account of the recorded
fulfillment of the Book of Revelation.
Because of the
widespread acceptance of
Dispensational
Futurism amongst American
evangelicals, Partial Preterism is often considered unorthodox by
many. Partial Preterism is also criticised for claiming that the Book of
Revelation was written before the
destruction of Jerusalem sometime during the reign of
Roman
emperorNero
in the 60s AD rather than in 95 AD which is the widely held belief among
Dispensationalists.
Kenneth Gentry, a prominent Partial Preterist, wrote his
PhD thesis
Before Jerusalem Fell (which has since been made into a book) on a
defense of placing the writing of the Book of Revelation during Nero's
reign.
·
EXTREME preterists,
or consistent preterists, as they prefer to be known, hold that all future
Bible prophecy was fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
If there is a future second coming, they say, the Bible does not talk
about it. Extreme preterists believe that there is no future bodily
resurrection, which place them outside the realm of Christian orthodoxy.
A
variant form is called Partial Preterism
which was developed within
Catholic tradition that identified the woman in Revelation 12 as
Mary rather than being symbolic of
Israel
and/or the
Church
in Protestant forms of Partial Preterism.
Most old
line Protestant denominations came out Catholicism and are still a lot
more Catholic than they would like to think. Even the most
Evangelical and Charismatic churches have the rudiments of Catholicism
in them, so it should not be surprising that a mild form of Preterism
would be found in some of them.
There are other assorted views, but we are trying to be brief here.
Here
are excerpts from a pamphlet by John Noe entitled: “What is the
Preterist View?”
"Scores of
preterist
books, tracts, video and audio tapes have been produced and many more are
on the way. It's beginning to capture significant public attention and is
'spreading like wildfire' at the grass roots level."
The final events of the
redemptive drama came to pass in the first century within the apostles'
generation( before A.D. 70). Christ's kingdom is here now. Paradise has
been restored in Christ (spiritually speaking). We live in the Garden of
Eden now (if we are in Christ)... "
"The biblical last days
are behind us, not ahead of us. They are in the past, not in the future.
Every New Testament reference to the last days or equivalent 'last times,
last hour', refers to the time its writers were living in the first
century. They weren't the last days of planet Earth, or the end of time.
They were the last days of the Old Covenant Jewish system and age. There
are no exceptions. "
Do you understand
what he's saying?
Mr. DeMar
attempts to defend his view in the following manner:
"But how
can we maintain that Jesus 'came' in A.D. 70? Jesus 'coming' in
judgment upon Jerusalem and His coming 'up to the Ancient of Days'
(Daniel 7:13; Matthew 24:30) were two events that occurred within
the time span of the first generation of Christians. There is no
future fulfillment of these events. "11
David Chilton
was one of the leading scholars of this movement. He was their leading
theologian up until his death. In his book, "Paradise Restored," he
summarizes the forty-five major arguments in his book. I'm only going
to list a few of these. I'm not trying to shock you. I am trying to
paint a picture for you with authenticity, verification and facts.
Here are just a few of the forty-five major arguments that he makes in
this book.
8. "The
wicked are 'raptured' first (i.e., driven out of the earth and
disinherited), as the righteous increasingly come into possession of
all things."
11.
"Daniel's prophecy of the Son of Man 'coming in the clouds' was
fulfilled in the Ascension of Christ."
(Notice,
they've got it backwards! They make Christ's ascension, his return!)
14. "Ethnic
Israel was excommunicated for its apostasy and will never again be
God's Kingdom."
17. "The
Olivet Discourse is not about the Second Coming of Christ. It is a
prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70." See they all go
back to A.D. 70."
18. "The
Great Tribulation took place in the fall of Israel. It will not be
repeated and thus is not a future event."
20. "Although
Israel will someday be restored to the true faith, the Bible does not
tell of any future plan for Israel as a special nation."
23. "The
'Great Apostasy' happened in the first century. We therefore have no
Biblical warrant to expect increasing apostasy as history progresses;
instead, we should expect the increasing Christianization of the
world."
24. "The
Last Days is a Biblical expression for the period between Christ's
Advent and the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70; the 'last days' of
Israel."
36. "The
'Millennium' is the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, which He established at
His First Advent."
(David
Chilton just said the millennium began when Christ came two thousand
years ago!)
38. "The
'thousand years' of Revelation 20 is symbolic for a vast number of
years, most likely many thousands."
42. "The
center for the Christian reconstruction of the world is the Church."
This book
entitled, "The Last Days According to Jesus," with the sub-title,
"When Did Jesus Say He Would Return?" Sproul writes,
"Josephus's
record of Jerusalem's fall indicates the radical fulfillment of
Jesus' prophecy in the Olivet Discourse. As we have seen, preterists
see in this event not only the destruction of the temple and its
attending circumstances, but also the parousia of Christ his
judgment-coming "13
Abanes is
about to show his true "doctrinal colors."
He
continues, "One question, however, must be answered: If Jesus was
telling the Jews present with him in the first century that they
were the generation who would see 'the end,' then is he guilty of
making a false prophecy? No. The 'end' about which he spoke may have
been the end of Israel and Jerusalem in 70 A.D, not the end of the
world. All of the 'signs' enumerated by Jesus took place in the
first century just before the destruction of Jerusalem under the
Roman Empire Titus. "20
Why does he
say we're wrong? Because everybody that preceded us for two thousand
years was wrong. However, that is faulty logic. That is like somebody
saying in 1945, "You know, preachers have said for nineteen hundred
and forty-five years that Israel would be reborn and they've all been
wrong. So all these guys today are wrong. "
But guess
what happened in 1948? Israel was reborn, thus setting this generation
apart from all generations that preceded it.
In fact, the
very nation of Israel itself is a real problem to the preterist
scoffers. The preterists have no plausible explanation for this great
miracle of history. The scoffers want us to believe that the
re-establishing of the nation of Israel in our lifetime is merely a
fluke, an accident of history. Yet today, for the first time since 586
BC, the Jewish people are living in their Biblical land under a
sovereign government.
It should be
overwhelmingly self-evident that Israel itself is Gods "super sign"
that we are in fact living in the last days, and stands as a strong
witness against the message of the modern scoffers of today.
The Preterists
contend that all New Testament prophecies about the last days all
occurred back at 70 A.D., including almost the entire book of
Revelation! Nice theory, only one major problem....
If John wrote
the Book of Revelation AFTER the Temple's destruction in 70 A.D., it
would essentially destroy their entire premise. And every single
Preterist teacher knows this fact.
The preterist
defender, Kenneth L. Gentry, in his enthusiastic review of David
Chilton's dominion theology book, “DAYS OF VENGEANCE", wrote, "If it
could be demonstrated that Revelation was written 25 years after the
fall of Jerusalem, Chilton 's entire labor would go up in smoke. "
Does anyone
know for sure "when" John the Revelator penned the Book of Revelation?
The vast majority of scholars and church historians contend the time
to be between 90-96 A.D.—some 25 years AFTER the destruction of
Jerusalem!
Thomas Ice
quotes Greek scholar and historian Kurt Aland in reference to the
actual date when the Book of Revelation was written by the Apostle
John.
"Aland says
that revelation was 'written about the year 96'. If this is true, it
renders the preterist's interpretation impossible, for Revelation is a
prophecy about a future event. "
"The majority
of scholars today think it unlikely that Revelation was written before
A.D. 70. Instead, they favor the A.D. 95-96 date. "34
There is a
total absence of any historical references from the first three
centuries following Christ to support the writing of Revelation prior
to 70 A.D.
If the Preterists
are right and Jesus returned to earth back in the first century as
they contend, then surely we can find somebody, somewhere, back there
in the first second and third century who believed and taught this
fact. Right? We cannot find even one!
THE COMING
RESURRECTION. Some preterists are partial preterists and some are
full preterists. I believe "full" preterists are guilty of true
heresy. True heresy is when you doctrinally deny one or more of the
essentials of the faith. If you deny an essential, you preach heresy.
We can differ on "non-essentials" all day; and still be brothers. But
when you deny an essential you've got a problem. True heresy is when
you deny the essentials. One of the "essentials" is the doctrine
concerning the coming Resurrection.
Now tell us,
Paul, how have they erred? Keep reading. "Saying that the resurrection
is past already..." In Paul's day there were some heretics who had
erred from the truth, trying to get gullible, naive Christians to
believe that the resurrection already occurred. My friend, that is
exactly and precisely what the scoffers are doing today. The extreme
preterists believe that there is no future bodily resurrection, which
places them outside the realm of Christian Orthodoxy.
Gary DeMar in
an appendix within his book reprints David Chilton's bold
declarations,
"The 'new
heavens and earth' promised to the Church comprise the age of the New
Covenant—the Gospel's triumph, when all mankind will come to bow down
before the Lord. John Bray writes: 'This passage is a grand
description of the gospel age after Christ came in judgment in 70 A.D.
and took away the old heavens and the old earth. We now had the new
heavens and the new earth of the gospel age. "
Notice yet
another quote from the preterist John Noe, "Because Peter said the
elements were going to melt with fervent heat... So what are these
'elements?' The 'elements' Peter is speaking of are the 'elementary
principles' or 'rudiments' of Judaism, that Old Covenant 'world' or
system, which would soon be destroyed in the coming of 'the day of the
Lord' in A.D. 70. What was the fire? This divine 'fire' destroyed the
Temple, the city, the sacrifices, the priesthood, the genealogies, the
tribes, and the whole heart, soul and physical components of the
Jewish religious system and theocracy—forever. Truly, Peter's 'world'
that was soon to perish was the world of biblical Judaism; Old
Covenant Israel."
Postmillennialism is an interpretation of chapter 20 of the biblical book of
Revelation which sees Christ's second coming as occurring after (Latin
post-) the "Millennium", a Golden Age or era of Christian prosperity and
dominance. The term subsumes several similar views of the end times, and it
stands in contrast to
premillennialism (the view that Christ’s second coming will occur prior
to his Millennial Kingdom, and that the Millennial Kingdom is a literal
1,000-year reign) and, to a lesser extent,
amillennialism (no literal millennium).
Postmillennialism refers to a belief that Christ returns after a period of
time, but not necessarily 1,000 years. Those who hold this view do not
interpret unfulfilled prophecy using a normal, literal method. They believe
that Revelation 20:4-6 should not be taken literally. They believe that
1,000 years simply means a long period of time. Furthermore, the prefix
"post" in postmillennialism denotes the view that Christ will return after
Christians (not Christ Himself) have established the kingdom on this earth.
Those
who hold to postmillennialism believe that this world will become better and
better—all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding—with the entire world
eventually becoming "Christianized." After this happens, Christ will return.
However, this is not the view of the world in the end times that Scripture
presents. From the book of Revelation, it is easy to see that the world will
be a terrible place during that future time. Also, in 2 Timothy 3:1-7 Paul
describes the last days as “terrible times.”
Those
who hold to postmillenialism use a non-literal method of interpreting
unfulfilled prophecy, assigning their own meanings to words. The problem
with this is that when you start assigning meanings to words other than
their normal meaning, a person can decide that a word, phrase, or sentence
means anything they want it to mean. All objectivity concerning the meaning
of words is lost. When words lose their meaning, communication ceases.
However, this is not how God has intended for language and communication to
be. God communicates to us through His written word, with objective meanings
to words so that ideas and thoughts can be communicated.
A
normal, literal interpretation of Scripture rejects postmillennialism and
holds to a normal interpretation of all Scripture, including unfulfilled
prophecy. Concerning the interpretation of prophecy, we have hundreds of
examples from Scripture of prophecies being fulfilled. Take for example the
prophecies concerning Christ in the Old Testament. Those prophecies were
fulfilled literally. Consider the virgin birth of Christ (Isaiah 7:14;
Matthew 1:23). Again, consider His death for our sins (Isaiah 53:4-9; 1
Peter 2:24). These were fulfilled literally. This is reason enough to assume
that God will continue in the future to literally fulfill His Word, His
prophecies of future events.
Postmillennialism and Dominionism are becoming hard to distinguish
apart these days. They are fusing into one system of belief,
especially popular in
the Third Wave
revival. It is the belief that Christ will return after the Church has
Christianized society, through a Christian force called "Joel's Army".
He will not rapture His elect because they will be victorious here on
earth. Jesus Christ does not come back bodily but returns "in His
Church" and reigns on earth through His Church spiritually.
Postmillennialism denies that Christ returns bodily to rule and judge.
The expression
Third Wave was coined by Christian theologian C. Peter Wagneraround
1980 to describe what followers
believe to be the recent historical work of the
Holy Spirit. It is part of a
larger movement known as the
Neocharismatic movement. The
"Third Wave" involves those
Christians who have received
Pentecostal-like experiences,
however Third Wavers usually claim no close association with either
the Pentecostal or
Charismatic movements.
The
First "wave" occurred at the beginning of the twentieth century with
the rise of the Pentecostal movement, beginning with the
Azusa Street Revival.
The Third "wave" occurred during the mid 1980s and continues today, and is
associated with
Wagner's own ministry, as well as the
Vineyard Movement. The
Toronto blessing and
Eternal Grace are also an
expression of this movement.
In
C. Peter Wagner's
book that is titled:
DOMINION!
How Kingdom Action Can Change the World,
he states that he is a Partial Preterist
and strong advocate of Dominion Theology.
Wagner said his eschatological views became clarified when he read
Victorious Eschatology by Harold Eberle and Martin Trench. He feels
that Victorious eschatology fits dominion theology like a hand in a
glove. Eberle and Trench say, "Before Jesus returns, the Church will
rise in glory, unity, and maturity. The Kingdom of God will grow and
advance until it fills the Earth."
Many Christians, including more conservative Pentecostals, have
rejected the Third Wave movement as being unbiblical, since some believe it to
include expressions of the Latter Rain Movement,
Manifest
Sons of God teaching and Kingdom Now theology, while many
within the Third Wave movement also reject these doctrines.
The teaching that in the last days, a "new breed" of
Christians will arise - the "Manifest
Sons of God"
- who will have supernatural spiritual power and be instrumental in
subduing the earth.
This movement is also referred to as "Joel's Army."
It
is claimed that these people will be perfected into their "glorified
bodies" prior to Christ's return. That perfection will allow them to
subdue the earth for Jesus. Proponents of this doctrine also claim
Christians, having a "divine nature," become "gods." They say Christ
came into us as a "seed" and grows into a "prophet." Thus Christ does
not physically return, but returns within us. The
rapture,
according to this doctrine, will be of the wicked - not of believers.
This teaching is part of what is known as 'dominion
theology' which teaches that an elite army of 'overcomers' will
either destroy or subdue all the enemies of Christ until they
eventually gain power and authority throughout the world. The
government of the nations will be upon their shoulders and when all
the secular authorities, governments, princes and kings have finally
submitted to them, Christ will return and they will present the
kingdom to him.
Source: Clifford Hill, "Prophecy Today," Vol. 7, No. 1 Eng., as
cited in "Joel's Army," 1991, Jewel van der Merwe, Discernment Min.
Many critics argue that the third wave differs from the charismatic
movement only in terminology, not in either theology or practice, so
to distinguish between the two is to make a distinction without a
difference. For example, Dr.
John MacArthur makes this
argument in his book Charismatic Chaos. Because of
its similarity to the charismatic movement, many criticisms of the
charismatic movement also apply to the Third Wave movement.
Although clearly a generalization that is not true of everyone
associated with each of these three waves, it is fair to speak of 3
subtly different theologies of their claims of experience of the
Spirit.
Those associated with the First Wave will generally preach the
"baptism with the Holy Spirit" as a separate experience to conversion
which must be accompanied by
speaking in tongues in order to
be genuine.
Those associated with the Second Wave will still tend to speak of a
second experience of the Spirit - a baptism or filling of the Spirit,
although they will often more readily state that all Christians in
some sense have the Spirit. They will also usually state that tongues
"usually" accompanies this experience.
Those associated with the third wave will tend to identify "baptism
with the Spirit" with conversion, and not refer to a second
crisis-like experience of receiving the Spirit. They would prefer to
emphasize the ongoing nature of the experience of the Spirit. Tongues
may not be emphasized at all, and will usually not feature in public
meetings. Some third wave leaders would themselves not speak in
tongues.
One thing is
clear about all this is that it is not a bit clear.
Dominion Theology
is a grouping of theological systems
with the common belief that society should be governed exclusively by the
law of God as codified in the Bible, to the exclusion of secular law, a view
also known as
theonomy.
The most prominent modern formulation of Dominion Theology is
Christian Reconstructionism, founded by
R. J. Rushdoony in the 1970s. Reconstructionists themselves use the word
dominionism to refer to their belief that civil government should be
controlled by Christians alone and conducted according to Biblical law.
Social scientists have used the word "dominionism" to refer to adherence to
Dominion Theology
as well as to the influence in the broader
Christian Right of ideas inspired by Dominion Theology.
Although such influence (particularly of Reconstructionism) has been
described by many authors,
full adherents to Reconstructionism are few and marginalized among
conservative Christians. [Taken
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominionism]
Reconstructionist Christianity
is a Christian movement which seeks to impose Biblical laws - especially Old
Testament laws - on America.
Christian Reconstructionism is a Calvinist movement in origin, therefore
most leading Christian Reconstructionists have either been Calvinists or
have been educated in the tradition of Reformed Theology. Christian
Reconstructionists all generally agree that biblical law needs to be applied
to modern American society, that all social ills can be traced to attempts
by humanity to rule itself independent of God's will, and that Christianity
should be privileged in culture and law.
Kingdom Now
proponents believe that
God lost control
over the world to
Satan when
Adam and Eve
sinned. Since then, the theology goes, God has been trying to
reestablish control over the world by seeking a special group of believers.
Through these people — known as "covenant people," "overcomers" or "Joel's
army," depending on the source — social institutions (including
governments and
laws) would be brought under God's authority. These "covenant people" or
"overcomers" are "little gods" — God's "extension" in the world to regain
authority from the devil. The church, under the leadership of "restored"
apostles and
prophets,
therefore must take over the world and put down all opposition to it before
Christ can return. Anyone who rebels against the church, along with
other "evildoers," must convert or be punished.
One of the most
controversial tenets of the theology is the belief that secular or
non-Christian society will never succeed, since, according to their beliefs,
the only valid legislation,
social theory, spiritual beliefs, and economic theory are those derived
from the Bible.
Hence, Kingdom Now opposes a
separation of church and state.
Kingdom Now theology
has some beliefs in common with the
Latter Rain Movement, such as a belief in restored apostles and
prophets. It also has a great deal in common with
Dominion theology which is the belief that this world can be conquered
for Christ by the temporal political, military, and religious powers of a
present day Christian superpower. Its
eschatology is a dominionist belief that a church-state takeover of the
world is awaiting fulfillment. Typically the belief comes on the scene
whenever a superpower comes to the apex of international wealth and power.
Some evangelicals call the belief "deceitfulness of riches". Those on the
political left are inclined to call it "jingoism". This optimistic, (some
call it high minded), spirit moves across from the state or a booming
merchant world to affect the church. It brings with it a new optimistic
ecclesiastical mindset for world takeover. This
[1] historical overview outlines Dominion Theology as it was seen and
demonstrated in the Edwardian era of the British Empire at the dawning of
the 20th century.
This theology is
preached by a small minority within the Charismatic movement. However, some
of the theology's most strident critics are also from within the Pentecostal
and Charismatic movements.
Some have claimed
that the non-Charismatic movement known as
Reconstructionism holds similar beliefs and that the two movements
largely complement one another. There are, however, some major differences.
Doctrines such as
theonomy
(the continued validity of the
Old Testament) and
Calvinism
(particularly
predestination and the sovereignty of God) are central to
Reconstructionist doctrine. Additionally, Reconstructionists nearly always
teach
cessationism, in opposition to the defining characteristics of the
Charismatic movement. Reconstructionists strongly disagree with many of the
doctrines of "Kingdom Now" theology and related theologies such as the
Latter Rain Movement and typically consider these movements to be heretical,
and are usually very critical of the
charismatic movement.
As I said earlier, the
end-time events include the coming of the antichrist, the 7
year tribulation, the Second Coming, and Christ ruling during
the 1000 years of peace...if you are a Premillennialist. But
if you are a Preterist or Historist you don't believe in any
of these prophesied events.
Eph 5:11 And have no fellowship with the
unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.
2Timothy 3:13 But evil men and impostors will
grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.
2 Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when they
will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their
own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up
for themselves teachers;
4 and they will turn their ears away from the
truth, and be turned aside to fables.
Permission is granted
(and you are also encouraged) to reprint these articles in hard copy form,
as well as sending them to your own email lists and posting them on your own
websites. We ask only that you keep ArkHaven website, email contact info,
and author contact information intact.
Ministry Support
We
appreciate your support and would love to hear from you.
[ArkHaven Ministries is
NOT a tax
exempt organization].
If you would like to support this ministry
Click
button
We would love to hear from you!
Please click on the email button
to share your thoughts with us...
On
March 8th 2008, at Mike Bickle of IHOP’s ‘Passion For Jesus Conference’,
as broadcast on GOD TV, I watched Lou Engle of ‘The Call’ fame speak.
As
he spoke, Lou Engle constantly rocked back and forth, as apparently he
almost always does now when preaching, under what he would claim to be the
anointing of the Holy Spirit. His spiritual manifestations are supposed
to be a sign that he speaks under the unction of the Holy Spirit and
when the jerks, grunts, twitches and miscellaneous experiences and
feelings get stronger, they supposedly bear witness to him and the
audience that what he says is true and prophetic and the ‘glory’ and
‘anointing’ of the Lord is there testifying to it. Thus manifestations
really do lead many in the church of today instead of the Word of
God or the real Spirit of God and not the imposter.
However, it was clearly not
the Holy Spirit that moved Lou Engle and who he prophesied by – because
of what Engle said - which was unbiblical heresy, and certainly not
spoken under the power and unction of the Holy Spirit, however much he
manifested, as the Holy Spirit can only testify to truth.
I
was quite surprised with how blatant these Kansas City Prophets and
their associated mouthpieces are now getting. For several years they
have tried to hide what they truly believe by double speak or outright
lies – especially Mike Bickle- and now, at this conference, it seemed it
was time to come right out with it and declare what they really think.
Or perhaps they forgot they were live on TV, I don’t know. Either which
way, nobody murmured at the conference – even at the horrendous bits –
and GOD TV kept broadcasting it.
In
the session I watched, Lou Engle spoke on the end times and the end
times generation. Fair enough you may say, because it is the end times. Right, I agree on this point, I do think
these really are the
Last Days and many alive now are part of the end times generation. But
from here Lou Engle and I and every other Bible-loving Christian must
part company, as Lou Engle parts company with scripture and starts
preaching and prophesying Latter Day Rain heresies – which of course the
Kansas City Prophets are fully steeped in.
For
all those that don’t yet know it, Todd Bentley is inextricably part of
this movement with personal mentoring by prophet Bob Jones, currently
the most exalted of the Kansas City Prophets – and wasn’t even K C
prophet Paul Cain wheeled out the other night at a Lakeland rally to add
his seal of approval?
Paul
Cain declared Todd Bentley to be Elijah (not another Elijah – I thought
William Branham and Bob Jones and even Paul Cain were supposed to be
Elijah? ‘I’m Spartacus, no, I’m Spartacus, no, I’m Spartacus! ), and
Paul Cain said that Todd Bentley’s revival was the start of the
fulfillment of his own long-touted Joel’s Army prophecies of stadiums
filled etc (if only that were all that there was to these prophecies
though! – more on that later).
Todd
Bentley’s healing ‘revival’ in Florida is a manufactured Latter Rain
revival which is more about extolling and elevating the
apostolic-prophetic movement under the headship of their ‘pope’ C Peter
Wagner, and its second in command Chuck Pierce, than is it about
anything else – and extending their dominion - whether it is done in
Jesus’ name or not.
The
Latter Rain doctrines and the Bible’s differ on many key points. People
can Google the finer details on Latter Rain, I do not want to
unnecessarily repeat other articles, but as some people, I know, will
not research, or do not have the time to research (although I suggest
they find the time as this is critical), very briefly, the main points
are these – (there is another brief overview here)
The
church has alway traditionally believed in the literal return of Jesus
Christ, coming in the clouds where every eye will see Him, after the world has been
in great travail with many earthquakes and natural disasters and famine
(which are but the birthpangs for the end, says Jesus), and after the
great tribulation (persecution) period after the antichrist has been
revealed and persecutes and kills the saints, and after many false
christs and workers of signs and wonders have been revealed, and
worldwide apostasy and sin has spread to epidemic proportions and there
is little love on the earth. The Bible teaches that at the end, Christ
returns and the church gets gathered and caught up to Him in the air in
‘the rapture’. Nobody can miss Christ’s return as it will be that obvious – as lightning flashes from the east
- promises Jesus, unmistakable he emphasis. Do not be deceived
otherwise, he emphasizes.
However, extreme Latter Rain heretics (and there are various spins on
it) believe and falsely prophecy that Jesus Christ appears within the
body of believers –
that is within them.
And so they literally become Jesus, a corporate Christ, the Manchild.
Rather than the body being in
Him, the body become
Him – the Manifested Sons of God doctrine – which of course is extremely
blasphemous. This is more than becoming like Jesus in His
character or works. This is more than having His Holy Spirit dwelling
within them. It is them, fallen human beings, literally becoming divine
and perfect and gods.
The
‘glory’ they speak of coming to the Bride is this – the perfection of
believers who become literally as gods. All under the authority of the
new apostles of course, who somehow are more godlike than the other
god-men and must be submitted to without question.
“There is a ministry … the ministry of perfection – the Melchizedek
Priesthood . . . your children will be moving into the ministries of
Perfection . . . coming into that Divine Nature of Jesus Christ . . .
they themselves will be that generation that’s raised up to put death
itself underneath their feet . . . because the Lord Jesus is worthy to
be lifted up by a church that
has reached the full maturity of the GOD-MAN!” (Bob
Jones)
“The
glory is shared, so the CLOUD which represents that glory IS SHARED.
Each elect son becomes a manifestation of the glory – of the CLOUD – of
the shekinah! Each son becomes the expression and revelation of the
Person of Deity. There is still only one Person of God, but He shall
eternally indwell a many-membered body of like ones unto Himself, the
extension and projection of His own Being. — He says, “I will dwell IN
THEM, and walk IN THEM… and ye shall be My sons and daughters.” (II Cor.
6:16-18). What, then, are those clouds with which, and in which, the
Christ comes again? Why, bless your heart, WE ARE!” (Preston Eby)
“His
Son was a ALPHA SON, your children are the OMEGA sons and daughters.”
(Bob Jones) -
How
blasphemous, Christ is the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end!
“In
the manifestation of the Sons of God…. the overcomers will become
perfected and step into immortality in order to establish the Kingdom of
God on earth.” (George Warnock)
These God-men, they prophesy will have extraordinary powers. You hear
all the new prophets talking about it and referring to it, though you
many not have twigged this is what they meant, what it refers to or
where it comes from – eg the walking through walls and levitating. They
will be the Joel’s Army Paul Cain prophesies. The apostles, of course,
are way at the top of the pecking order - and will [if given the chance]
demand unquestioning obedience as generals of the army as they thump
their iron rod across the globe.
“Not
only will they not have diseases, they will also not die. They will have
the kind of imperishable bodies that are talked about in the 15th
chapter of Corinthians … this army is invincible. If you have intimacy
with God, they can’t kill you.” (Paul Cain)
There is nothing in the Bible that promises believers immortality this
side of death. Death will be put under Christ’s feet but right at the
very end of the ages, when there will be a new heaven and a new earth
too. The only ones who will not see death are those still alive at the
time of the rapture, who will somehow be transformed ‘in the twinkling
of an eye’ and become clothed with the imperishable. Todd Bentley has
apparently mentioned recently at Lakeland there is no need for believers
to age and die this side of death. There is nothing in the Bible that
promises believers immortality and nothing that promises invincibility
either, however much faith the believer may have, however intimate they
are with God.
It
is nonsense that ‘If you have
intimacy with God, they can’t kill you’ for the prophet
Daniel, the apostle John and Paul, and Jesus, says repeatedly that the
saints will be killed for their faith, especially during the Great
Tribulation. The saints did not love their lives more than they loved
God and sacrificed them at the altar. (Another false teaching spread by
‘prophet’ Dimitri Duduman is that if you are holy enough you’ll likewise
avoid persecution.) Indeed, the Bible says that the antichrist will be
given power to make war against the saints and to overcome them … and
the great dragon, Satan, will be unleashed and allowed to in a new
terrible and savage way to make war on the true church, and to win (from
an earthly perspective).
Far
from the true remnant church being invincible triumphant overcomers in
the Last Days, many will be beheaded, put to the sword, or otherwise be
killed. They do overcome
spiritually by their word and their testimony – but they
are still mortal martyrs that still die a physical death. The only ones
that will be invincible and untouchable in the Last Days will be the antichrist’s forces –
not God’s. Paul Cain yet again betray the true spiritual nature and
source of his movement by speaking as he has.
The
Latter Rain new apostolic perfect invincible church, they say, shall
have dominion over the earth and rule the nations with a rod of iron
through the new apostles – hence the dominionists like C Peter Wagner.
The new apostles do not just want to rule the church, they want to rule
the world. And they have already set many things in place in
the world of finance, media and government to this end – and set things
up so they have information on many denomination’s church members by
their ‘harmless’ collection of data for statistical purposes. So
they know where the church members live to come and get you if you do
not submit – to them and not God, that is.
“As
the rod of His strength goes out of Zion, He’ll change legislation.
He’ll chase the devil off the face of God’s earth, and God’s people
together, doing the will of God, will bring about God’s purposes and
God’s reign. “ (Ern Baxter)
The
new end time apostles rule the Church through independent churches,
unaffiliated with the ‘corrupt denominations’ as per William Branham’s
teaching that all denominations are corrupt. The denominational
churches they declare will eventually all disband to join in with this
new church/new movement, under the new apostle’s leadership.
Ever
wondered where the ecumenical movement is going? The antichrist is
Caesar, the leader of the revived ’Rome’. This new apostolic church, of
course, with the false prophet mouthpiece and its signs and wonders is
joined at the hip with Rome (beast one and beast two) – (ever wondered
why so many of the new prophets are in the Roman Catholic illuminati
Knights of Malta?), becomes the one world religion as so many have been
apparently converted to the Latter Rain ’Christ’ and the new apostle’s
religion in the revival – most won by signs and wonders they do not test
done under the power of the antichrist, the others won over or
threatened by persuasive force. It is essential to them for the church
to be unified as one, under their apostles, or they think
their corporate Christ cannot be fully incarnated (manifested) in the
Church and give his power to conquer the whole world. So there will be
more than pressure applied on those individuals and churches who will
not join in with the apostles – but more on that later.
They
claim there will be a worldwide revival with amazing healings, signs and
wonders and miracles by elite overcomers – winning an end-time harvest
of billions of souls, where the majority of the world, they say will be
won to Christ and the kingdom would be established or ready to be
received by Christ. It does not seem to matter whether converts or won
or forced.
“It
will be said of the apostles soon to be anointed that they have turned
an upside down world right side up. Nations will tremble at the mention
of their name.” (Rick Joyner, said in 1988, not that long before the new
apostles under C Peter Wagner were ‘anointed’)
The
army – Joel’s Army – won’t just love people into the kingdom – they will
be militant, thinking themselves the enforcers of God’s will on earth,
ruling with their rod of iron. Spiritual warfare becomes literal, the
church having become accustomed and softened to the militaristic and
Dominionist talk through spiritual warfare and worship songs. They will
say that as all those that oppose them are opposing God (as they as
perfect god-men are God), and are permanently lost because of then, then
killing them is no big deal anyway, or perhaps it will be viewed as God
executing his ‘final’ judgment on unbelievers, as they are God remember.
I am not making this up – this comes from their own writings.
“They won’t be able to kill this army.” (Jack Deere)
“Those in this army will have the kind of anointing … this kind of power
… anyone who wants to harm
them must die.”
(John
Wimber – yeah, I was shocked when I read ‘pussy-cat’ Wimber said this.
As
speaking against the new apostles is seen as harming – ‘touch not my anointed, nor do my prophets any harm’ as
so frequently misquoted to keep dissenters quiet and in their place –
all that oppose this Antichrist force even by speaking out ’must die’ by
divine intervention – that is
their intervention. The opposers, the remnant church will
be killed. Nice! Still want to follow this wonderful revival of
Todd Bentley, folks?
Joel’s
army in scripture far from being the Lord’s end-time army, are a
devastating dark army that destroys and devours God’s people. It comes
from the King of the North – that is Babylon – that is Rome. So Paul
Cain yet again actually testifies with scripture what their schemes are
– antichrist – for they testify that is what they are, this army. Even if we did
not know it already by their blasphemies, heresies and ecumenicism, we
know it here.
(Elsewhere it is prophesied that Joel’s army has feet of mixed iron and
clay – again this is Daniel’s vision of the antichrist
‘empire’ the persecutor comes from (Rome and the mixed nations, so yet
again they testify against themselves!) And of course scripture does not
predict an end time revival like this, it predicts an end time apostasy,
a great falling away and a great persecution of the Saints. But the
Latter Rain doesn’t mention the antichrist in their theology, it can’t –
because they are the
antichrist (if they get their way)!
Paul
Cain predicted of the stadiums being filled: “What if 120,000 get
together and then the fire
comes from heaven and the glory of God…” This is what
the false prophet does in Revelation 13: 13,14
And he [the false prophet] doeth great wonders, so that he maketh
fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men: And deceiveth
them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had
the power to do in the sight of the beast…
While I acknowledge there are many that are deeply sincere, I know that
many of the powers that be in the new apostolic-prophetic movement are
not that ignorant of scripture, and well know the things that Paul Cain
and B Jones and others testify too. They know what they are doing, and
they know whom they serve. But it has always been the case that an
effective way to undermine an organization is by sending in plants to
divert, subvert and to corrupt and to convert from within.
Counter-operations if you like. M16, the CIA and the KGB do it. The
communists did it the church, as did the Jesuits and other Romanists,
as do even Satanists. And Satan sends in his false apostles. Why church
are you so shocked? Don’t you realise you are in a war?
For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we
preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you
received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up
with it easily enough. But I do not think I am in the least inferior to
those “super-apostles.”
(2 Corinthians 11:4-5)
‘For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen,
masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself
masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his
servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what
their actions deserve. (2
Corinthians 11:13-15)
I am
reminded here of the visions I have had. Last July I saw affliction
coming onto the church (and a great falling away) - (Prophecy
here)
-
I
then saw a large army rushing forward, dressed in black armour, their
helmets were affiliated to evil, they were rushing en-masse, pressing
down and swooping down – God called it an ‘army from the North’* rushing
down in a semi-circular formation – like a hurricane formation – and
then it came too from the East so it was like a North East wave,
momentous in its force, and it looked like it was coming down upon the
map of the USA (the ’seat’ of 21st century lukewarm Christianity?) over
from the North and then the East. ‘The army will be like bees,’ said
God, ‘with a sting in their tail’. Just like God allowed pharaoh and
other ungodly kings to bring judgment upon Israel – in order that they
may repent and come back to Him – so He would use ungodly forces to
bring affliction upon the modern day church
if they did not repent and become hot.
This
is the Joel’s Army of scripture – but it seems, if Latter Rain get their
way, this dark enemy massing from Babylon is actually the church warring
against the church – the harlot church against the true church.
See
also this about the corrupt church’s plotting for power, and their then
being empowered by the dragon with real spiritual power (albeit dark)
as he comes to unleash his anger upon the world. Note also the
connection to Rome - Prophecy
here
Behind closed doors they go and kings and bishops conspire against me
(says God). I see a
vision of them playing like military generals on a war map, pushing the
pieces around with those sticks they use. They – The Vatican (?) with
others – push a ‘black’ dark army against a nation, but why? ‘For their
own power and wealth and gain. They care not about me. They crush the
poor and steal bread from the children’s mouths.’ I then see a vision of
them trying to jumpstart a car – they lack power (of a spiritual sort)
but soon that false satanic
spark will come and testify for them. It comes like a
black star falling into the sea – it goes into the deep abyss and then
arises like a monster with a roar and fury for its time is short.
Then
see how the signs and wonders movement is connected to corrupt and to
infiltrate the church with a poisonous gospel, and to win it to heresy
from the inside -Prophecy
here
Note too the testimony to Mary and to Rome. This is where signs and
wonders are going as can be seen in some of the last posts on this site
on the New Mystics, contemplative meditation and stigmatisim etc.
I
had a vision…. saw a pond, and I knew this pond represented the modern
day Christian church (all denominations). Reeds surrounded the edge of
the pond and dipped their head in the water, and this water was supposed to be the water
of life, feeding the many flocks from the surrounding fields who came to
quench their thirst from the heat of the day, and being an oasis of
tranquillity and calm in the world.
However, I saw that the pond water was bitter – it had been poisoned,
intentionally and deliberately. I saw the water was in many parts
stagnant and stinking, with dead flies lying on top of yucky
yellowy-green algae clumped up together. There were large parts of the
pond covered with this yellowish-green gunk and in some parts I could
even see the ‘whiff’ rising as steam from the water. It was acrid.
However, in some parts of the pond, dotted here and there, there still
seemed to be life and movement in the water, and it was cleaner and
freer water underneath the surface, but the water in these sections was
still not flowing as well as it should, it was being hindered with a
limited space to move in before hitting a stinking section again. It was
surrounded by gunk which bordered it on all sides. I saw this gunk press
in and gain ground on the clean water, and it was like an army pressing
in and gaining ground, pushing and charging and pressing in like a
general moves the toy piece across to gain ground on a military map,
except this ‘wall’ of military might was on all sides – this ‘wall’ was attempting to squeeze the life and cleanness out of the
‘good’ ‘clean’ sections of water. I saw there was (or would be) fear and
intimidation from these stinking parts of the pond.
I
saw a large silver fish leap up from the water and then go back in
again. It was unhealthy and gasping for breath, it could not breathe
well because of the bad water. I wondered about this for some time. I
remember the tactics of armies in the Roman Empire who poisoned their
enemy’s water supplies - it was an effective method of ‘guerilla’
warfare, although out of order and acknowledged as barbaric. It got people without their even
realising, by the time they realized it was too late. To that extent it
was cunning - ’subtle’ and ’seductive’.
I
wondered who would do such a thing to the church, and then I
saw seductive spirits and the ‘men’ behind getting them into the modern
day church. These counterfeit
spirits (with seductive teachings) acted as the poison in the water,
dropping in as blackness into the water and this poison spread rapidly
and remarkably over the pond. The pond yielded seemingly
without blinking, quite happy. Particularly, I saw the poison that had
spread through the church ‘pond’ from the Toronto Blessing. This
seduction had achieved in poisoning a wide spectrum of denominations
with remarkable success, and made them pliable and open to delusion that
few seductive teachings or spirits before had had such success with. Its
success was also in going beyond a relatively limited sphere of
influence within a singular denomination to affect and poison almost all
denominations and groups. It (Toronto) was one of the most successful
seductions of the church as it had achieved what few other
’spirits’ had, and people under it were completely blind to its
bad fruit. Once avoided false shepherds had achieved credibility and
were ‘gurus’ to even non charismatic or pentecostal circles. False
prophets and apostles birthed from it were now accepted by the wider
body as coita.
The
pond thought they had life, yet the pond stank and was never in a worse
state! It thought it was alive, yet what I saw was ‘living’ (in the most
part) was bacteria and vermin feeding off it. I was shocked at the
deliberate intent and malice at the poisoning of the pond.
I
then saw what looked like Tinkerbell (the fairy from Peter Pan) hovering
over the stagnant parts of the pond, calling to them and whispering
lovingly. She had silver stars on her head, and she was dressed in
sparkling white and had a beautiful woman’s face that then became like
the Madonna (note: the Virgin Mary as Roman Catholics see her, not the Biblical Mary).
She looked holy and demure and beautiful and spiritual and she carried a
wand which she held over the pond and the wand twinkled with stars and
magical sparkle and gold dust which fell to the pond but when it touched
the water it was dark and black and poisoned it even more, yet the pond
water opened up more to accept it and thought it wonderful. She
whispered sweetly and seductively and she was a marvelous sight indeed
as she offered ‘magic’ and ‘mystery’. She got the eyes of the pond looking
at her instead of focusing on Jesus – her name is Seduction – but some
know her as ‘whore’. The pond looked at her in wonder and began to seek
her only and to worship her, not even realizing they had been lead away
from the true Jesus, they were so busy marveling at her and her signs.
I
could see the water (the people) reach out to her with open hearts with
great joy and relief – they truly saw her as a sign, and she was, yet
she was not of God but from the evil one. But they thought her
marvellous.
I
think it is clear to most what this vision means. Let him who has ears let him have ears
what the Spirit has to say to the churches. WAKE UP! YOU ARE IN GREAT DANGER AND
DO NOT EVEN KNOW IT, SEE HOW YOU SLUMBER. I COULD POKE YOU IN THE RIBS
AND YOU NOT EVEN STIR. You have allowed these things in, what are you
going to do about it? Repent, kick them and their heinous theories out?
Seek me and seek cleansing and forgiveness. Seek to rescue the flock,
speak up and rid your church of these things, be ruthless. It is too
late for many of your people caught in this though. They stare right
ahead, they will not listen to you if you tell them to turn from these
things, they are enraptured, seduced, captured, gone. Like birds caught
in a snare, their wings beat but they cannot fly free. Whose fault is
it?
Then
see this, I got only days before ‘revival’ hit Lakeland – Prophecy here
I saw the harvest fields (traditionally associated with the mission
field) - but these fields were inside the ‘church’. They were ripe,
plump and rich for harvest. I then saw a hoard of dark locusts or other
insects devouring this beautiful ripe wheat, and as insects did they attacked the grain
en masse – tiny nibbles here and there, but en masse it was devastating
on the crop. I saw the swarm near the bottom of the
grain stalks (where the grains stand), and there were many tiny holes
and soon this wheat would not be able to stand as the stalks would be so
weakened. I realized the
dark locusts represented the false teachers and teachings within the
modern day ‘church’, bringing about devastating damage because of the
sheer amount of them. The darkness representing their spiritual identity
– of darkness and not of the light. Note also, the
devastation brought about by ‘tiny’ deviations of doctrine or ‘only little bits’ of bad
behavior, what damage is done when it is done on a large enough scale,
by enough insects. I had never seen it quite like this before - it was
awful to watch. The swarm was allowed at the crop, and it was a terrible
thing to behold.
I
then thought about the Joel
prophecy about locusts. The locusts in Joel represented
the enemy’s army of the North
– Babylon – allowed by God to attack and destroy His people and
their property because of their distance from God, their sin and
apostasy. ‘Babylon’ in the book of Revelation is the
apostasy of the world, and spiritual adultery in a religious setting,
thriving on greed and corruption and a distorted message. And indeed
Babylon is eating away at the modern day church – a hoard of false
teachers on the religious television channels and in the pulpits and
bookstores – and Babylon has become so intermingled with her, that the
church is almost at one with it (instead of being at one with Christ
Jesus).
I
thought about the phrase: ‘I will restore the years the locusts have
eaten….’ and wondered with my heart skipping a few beats of
excitement: God, does that mean
you will restore the church from its present state of decay to something
amazing in this generation…? To restore it from a state of
decline and apostasy and decay and corruption to something wonderful
again, radiant and pure and true to the word? I thought about this and
prayed for some time: perhaps something wonderful could happen in this generation, despite what I knew was
to come in the future - but was then shown from various scriptures that
were brought to my mind that this could not be so about the ‘church’ –
although it could be about the smaller remnant true church (being
Christ’s body) rather than the institution as such. God, of course,
wanted what people think of as the ‘church’ to be right, and to repent,
and to live in truth and be saved, but the truth is, I was shown, it
will not be, as the majority will not repent and get right with God,
or lay down their delusions or golden calfs at the alter.
I
was then shown a vision of a handsome Prince Charming wearing his crown,
coming to kiss the sleeping
beauty church and awaken her from her evil inspired slumber.
For a moment, again my heart skipped a beat – could this be Jesus coming
for his bride – but almost immediately as I thought it, I was told this
was notJesus, but
another one – a pretender to his throne. Oh Lord, Lord, do not let this be so –
no, God! I groaned, devastated, and begged that it would
not be so, but I knew that it must be so, for what is written. I
knew this Prince Charming was
the antichrist with the false prophet mouthpiece, and the church was
fooled by him because she was (for the most part) asleep, and she took
for herself a husband that was not her husband. If she
had been awake and alert, she would not have been taken in by this
Prince Charming (who looked so like Jesus I wondered for a moment if I
was wrong about his true identity) coming for the church……he would kiss
them awake and ‘revive’ them, with something the like of which we ain’t
seen nothing of yet, real amazing signs in the heavens above etc, not
just charlatanism - and it would be thought to be true revival by the
‘church’ but would be something awful in its overtones and its
consequences. But this all had to happen so the scriptures would be
fulfilled about a powerful end time delusion, and the state of the end
time church. How it grieved me, how it grieved me. I wish it were not
so….
In the
Last Days, this false Prince, this pretender, will make War against the
Saints and overcome them – but don’t you know, the way to first
make war is to pretend you are on the other party’s side and undermine
them or convert them to your cause. How many Trojan Horses as enticing
gifts, have gone into the church, with the enemy hidden inside the
horse’s belly to convert the church from the inside to apostasy? Swarmsof them, I tell you, swarms of
the dark army have run into the church and have ensconced themself there
quite comfortably. And how succesful they have been, yet
when I cry out a warning about them, I have stones flung at me by the
church who insist I am not loving for saying this, and ordered to be
quiet! Church, stop tolerating this dark enemy within you! If you want
to practice true spiritual warfare, forget what Cindy Jacobs falsely
prophecies and promises, but do something that will have almost
immediate results – clean yourself up! Rid the enemy from your camp, and
rid yourself of those that have intermarried with the enemy, and become
a pure army, so that at least you
will be able to stand, and carry on standing, and your legs
will not be weakened by the locust nibbles.
What
can I say to you all, then, but to be awake and alert – and watch and
pray – and don’t fall asleep, for
truly I say to you, we are in the days of the burning of the tenth lamp
of oil (pp parable of the ten virgins). And warn the others.
A prince comes soon – very
soon. But it is the prince Daniel spoke of, not the Lord Jesus Christ.
The Lord Jesus Christ will
return, but when he does EVERY eye will see Him etc. Do not be fooled by this prince in the
meantime. Stay awake and make sure you have enough oil.
And
then see how there are incredible feelings and highs associated with
this antichrist move that are hard to distinguish – even for the saints.
Vision here
I then felt a tremendous tangible and also spiritual sense of peace, yet
it was not from the Lord Jesus, it was from the antichrist. It was a
false peace but it felt so incredible and so nice and so real and true
that if the Lord had not told me it was not Him I would have thought it
were from Him.
Time
and time again, God has prophesied who the locusts are. And time and
time again the false prophet prophesies who the locusts are too. Why on
earth don’t the church listen? Wake up, I tell you, wake up! For this
army, they prepare for war.
*****
So
now, with that basic background info our of the way let’s look at what
Lou Engle actually said at the
Passion for Jesus conference that night.
He
referred to the new Elijahs rising up, preparing the way as forerunners.
(James Goll linked to Lou Engle on the Call’s board), wrote in Charisma Magazine that The Call would result in “a new
breed of radical, fierce, yet humble intercessors… emerging on the
scene”. He points out that “in every generation God raises up
forerunners… like John the Baptist…to prepare the way.” The spirit of
antichrist does the same thing in the use of his forerunner, the false
prophet. What are Goll et al forerunning since they have such antichrist
doctrines? Are, indeed, they and their kind the false prophet spoken of
on Revelation who testifies to the beast? I think so. Or let’s say, they
want to be. Whether or not God lets them do it, is another thing.
Lou
Engle said that Elijah was a ‘God man’, (he used those words) and what
was written about him was ‘prophetic’ for the end time Elijah Company.
Lou
Engle spoke on civil war in the church, and he was talking about it
[whether people recognise itot now] literally, not just spiritually or
metaphorically. This is the new apostolic takeover, or as Bob Jones
prophesied, the civil war with the blues and greys (the people basically
who have the new revelation and those in the church who oppose it).
There was a lot of elitism and Nazarite separation and baloney he also
mentioned, but I am focussing here on the dangerous militaristic
teachings – this man, that so many people call sweet, humble and gentle,
calls the apostolic church to ungodly war. Church, for God’s sake wake
up and do not tolerate this man or this antichrist movement – or its
revivals. God help us all!
*************
According to Lou Engle, the initial vision for The Call was based on a
prophetic message delivered by Bob Jones—who prophesied in 1993 that
100,000 people—mostly youth—would meet in Nashville to pray and usher in
a new movement of the Holy Spirit. Of couse his own movement rushed to
fulfil Bob Jones prophecies, so it was self fulfilling prophecy – just
like the manufactured Toronto Blessing and other things were created to
make them fit Bob Jones words and Latter Rain agenda.